Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;5:11974. doi: 10.1038/srep11974

Figure 4. Results of control experiments 1 and 2.

Figure 4

The bouncing ball sequence in the current study included (1) simulating the effect of gravity and (2) improving movement smoothness. The current 600 ms IOI sequence with the two manipulations was compared with a control sequence without the two manipulations in control experiment 1, and was compared with control sequences without one of the two manipulations in control experiment 2. The results of control experiment 1 (A) showed that combining the two manipulations significantly improved tapping stability. The results of control experiment 2 (B) showed that removing individual manipulations did not yield significant performance differences, although the mean stability was highest for the sequence with both manipulations (GES&MSI vs. GES: t8 = 1.679, p = 0.132, η2 = 0.261; GES&MSI vs. MSI: t8 = 1.931, p = 0.090, η2 = 0.318). GES represents the gravity effect simulation and MSI represents the movement smoothness improvement. GES&MSI refers to the 600 ms IOI bouncing ball sequence as in experiment 1. Other conventions are as in Fig. 2.