Table 1.
Test | Locia | TEb | Number of samples | Difference between replicatesc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum | Minimum | Mean | ||||
Across platesd | SCHRBa_011_K15 | scIvana 1.1 | 22 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.29 |
SCHRBa_015_O15 | scIvana 1.4 | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.21 | |
SCHRBa_044_D02 | scIvana 1.2 | 17 | 0.78 | 0.02 | 0.28 | |
Across Real-Time PCR systemse | SCHRBa_011_K15 | scIvana 1.1 | 4 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.28 |
SCHRBa_015_O15 | scIvana 1.4 | 4 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 0.55 | |
SCHRBa_044_D02 | scIvana 1.2 | 4 | 1.31 | 0.44 | 0.82 | |
Template concentrationf | SCHRBa_044_D02 | scIvana 1.2 | 8 | 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.37 |
Primer concentrationg | SCHRBa_015_O15 | scIvana 1.4 | 48 | 0.97 | 0.02 | 0.38 |
SCHRBa_044_D02 | scIvana 1.2 | 42 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.46 | |
Threshold settingh | SCHRBa_011_K15 | scIvana 1.1 | 8 | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.11 |
SCHRBa_015_O15 | scIvana 1.4 | 9 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.09 | |
SCHRBa_044_D02 | scIvana 1.2 | 8 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
a The BAC number in which in the scIvana element was identified (de Setta et al., 2014).
b Name of the TE. scIvana 1.1 and 1.2 have been described previously (Domingues et al., 2012).
c All results are estimates of the ratio of alleles with the element to alleles without the element and were transformed into a total of 10. Only the figure for the presence of the allele is shown.
d Master mixes were set up separately and run on two separate plates.
e Reactions were run on either the Applied Biosystems 7300 or Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR systems.
f Genomic DNA was added at a final concentration of 0.13 or 1.3ng μl–1.
g Primers were added at a final concentration of 500nm and optimized. For optimized primer concentrations, see Supplementary Table S2.
h Threshold settings were set at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5.