Skip to main content
. 2015 May 27;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0546-8

Table 1.

Overview of cases

Type of hospital Caseload model Funding Scale of model Caseload midwifery targets Caseload details*
Highly specialised university hospital Funded by reduced staffing of ward midwives from: 4 caseload groups Nulliparas + women who plan early discharge + planned homebirths in hospital catchment area (1 %) • 120 births per annum per group
8 a.m. (1 group with 2 midwives, 3 groups with 3 midwives) • Mixed risk status
Obstetric unit with 4900 births 8 p.m. • Max 50 % nullipara
7 p.m-7 a.m.
7 p.m.
Neonatal intensive care unit
7 p.m.
Specialised mid-level hospital Funded by reduced staffing of ward midwives from: 8 caseload groups Nulliparas • 120 births per annum per group
Obstetric unit with 2400 births 6 a.m. (6 groups: 1 with 2 midwives, 5 with 3 midwives) • Mixed risk status
6 p.m. • 100 % nullipara
5 a.m-5 p+a.m. Vulnerable and/or socially dis-advantaged mothers ** • 120 births per annum per group
Neonatal intensive care unit 5 p.m. (1 group with 3 midwives) • Mixed risk status
4 a.m. Twin pregnancy or women with fear of childbirth • Mixed nulli- and multiparas
(1 group with 2 midwives)
Community hospital Earmarked funding for pilot project 2 caseload groups All women from local area • 140 births per annum per group
Obstetric unit with 1900 births (2 groups, each with 3 midwives) • Mixed risk status
No neonatal intensive care unit • Mixed nulli- and multiparas

*Groups consisted of two full-time midwives (37 h/weekly average) or three midwives working either part-time (e.g. 30 h/week) or full-time, divided between caseload (e.g. 25 h/weekly average) and ordinary ward shifts (e.g. 12 h/weekly average)

**Pregnant women, e.g. who are young (<20 years) and/or affected by mental health or social problems