Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 12;148(1):32–54. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0164

TABLE 4 ] .

Summary of Findings: Degree of Intervention Fidelity by Design

Individual Element Score Range 0-6a Range 0-8 Range 0-48b
Clinical Study Design (n) Study Design Training of Providers Delivery of Treatment Receipt of Treatment Enactment of Treatment
Element 1a 1b 1c 2 3a 3b 4 5 No. Elements Present Overall IF Score
Prospective observational studies (17) 5.06 4.71 2.00 3.06 3.00 4.00 0.06 0.53 5.29 22.41
Randomized clinical trials (2) 3.50 3.00 5.00 3.50 2.50 6.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 24.50
Retrospective observational studies (4) 3.75 1.75 1.00 1.50 1.75 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 11.75
Overall summary (23) 4.70 4.04 2.09 2.83 2.74 3.83 0.04 0.48 5.04 20.74

1a = guideline/protocol; 1b = screening appropriate to 1a; 1c = validated/standardized cough outcome measure used; 2 = providers with expanded knowledge of guidelines/protocols and education provided and manual used; 3a = core management interventions appropriate to 1a; 3b = response assessed; 4 = reference to patient understanding as part of methods; 5 = reference to patient’s ability to use interventions in daily life. See Table 3 legend for expansion of abbreviations.

a

For the individual IF element scores, 0 = no fidelity to 6 = highest degree of fidelity possible; all scores are displayed as averages.

b

For the overall IF score ratings: good (36-48), fair (24-35), poor (≤ 23); all scores are displayed as averages.