Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;14:59. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0040-9

Table 3.

Fecundability ratios according to plasma PFOS and PFOA by parity

Sample 1 Sample 2 Pooled analysis
Crude FR Adjusteda FR 95 % CI Crude FR Adjusteda FR 95 % CI Crude FR Adjustedb FR 95 % CI
PFOS
N Q1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2 1.16 1.16 0.77 - 1.75 0.97 0.89 0.68 - 1.17 1.02 0.98 0.78 - 1.23
Q3 1.07 1.01 0.65 - 1.57 0.80 0.68 0.52 - 0.91 0.87 0.78 0.62 – 1.00
Q4 0.98 0.97 0.62 - 1.51 0.79 0.69 0.53 - 0.91 0.84 0.79 0.63 – 0.99
Log 1.06 1.02 0.72 – 1.44 0.75 0.62 0.47 – 0.83 0.86 0.78 0.63 – 0.97
P Q1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2 0.91 1.04 0.69 - 1.55 0.86 0.88 0.69 - 1.12 0.88 0.92 0.75 - 1.14
Q3 0.95 1.05 0.69 - 1.60 0.71 0.72 0.56 – 0.94 0.77 0.80 0.65 – 0.99
Q4 0.89 1.04 0.70 - 1.55 0.84 0.90 0.70 - 1.14 0.85 0.93 0.76 - 1.15
Log 0.82 0.91 0.63 – 1.30 0.79 0.85 0.66 – 1.09 0.77 0.86 0.70 – 1.06
PFOA
N Q1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2 0.88 0.82 0.53 – 1.26 1.09 0.93 0.71 - 1.23 1.03 0.90 0.71 - 1.13
Q3 1.15 1.11 0.73 – 1.69 0.94 0.80 0.71 - 1.07 0.99 0.90 0.71 - 1.13
Q4 0.98 0.99 0.64 – 1.54 0.82 0.74 0.56 - 0.98 0.86 0.82 0.65 - 1.04
Log 1.23 1.26 0.86 – 1.85 0.73 0.67 0.51 – 0.88 0.87 0.84 0.67 – 1.05
P Q1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2 1.19 1.30 0.86 – 1.98 0.78 0.76 0.59 - 0.96 0.85 0.86 0.70 – 1.06
Q3 0.93 0.96 0.66 - 1.41 0.69 0.71 0.56 – 0.90 0.74 0.78 0.63 - 0.94
Q4 0.70 0.74 0.48 - 1.13 0.76 0.78 0.61 – 0.99 0.74 0.76 0.61 – 0.94
Log 0.64 0.66 0.46 – 0.95 0.74 0.76 0.61 – 0.93 0.68 0.72 0.61 – 0.87

aAdjusted for age, socio-economic status, and body mass index. bAdditionally adjusted for sample

Abbreviations: Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), nulliparous women (N), parous women (P), quartile (Q), log-transformed continuous exposure levels (Log), fecundability ratio (FR), 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI)