Skip to main content
. 2015 May 15;36(1):159–165. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2212

Table I.

µCT analysis of trabecular bone in male placebo (vehicle)- and etidronate-treated Enpp1−/− and WT mice.

WT
Enpp1−/−
Placebo Etidronate Placebo Etidronate
BV/TV (%) 8.79±1.59 8.75±1.79 3.39±1.06a,e 4.63±1.57a,e
BMD (g/cm3) 0.139±0.021 0.13±0.024 0.042±0.020a,e 0.062±0.025a,e
Tb.Th (µm) 60.62±4.31 57.34±8.34 48.35±3.08a,e 47.99±3.54a,d
Tb.Sp (µm) 298.24±12.68 290.47±26.56 363.66±48.07a,d 319.66±48.44b,c
Tb.N 0.00146±0.00023 0.0015±0.00029 0.00070±0.00024a,e 0.00097±0.00034a,e
Tb.Pf 0.027±0.0026 0.026±0.0033 0.042±0.0036a,e 0.0392±0.0053a,e
SMI 2.48±0.11 2.33±0.23 2.78±0.093a,d 2.69±0.22a,e
DA 2.30±0.19 2.08±0.15 2.42±0.28 2.39±0.31a,c

Results are expressed as the means ± SEM.

a

Significant difference compared to wild-type (WT) mice;

b

significant difference compared to placebo-treated mice.

c

P<0.05;

d

P<0.01;

e

P<0.001. µCT, micro-computed tomography; BV/TV, bone volume/trabecular bone volume; BMD, bone mineral density; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Pf, trabecular patten factor; SMI, structure model index; DA, degree of anisotropy.