Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb 10;22(3):361–368. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398493

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Results from Experiment 1: (a) stimulus-driven capture cost and (b) contingent capture cost as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and working memory capacity and (c) correlation between recovery time for contingent capture (time point at which capture cost declined to 5%) and working memory capacity. Stimulus-driven capture cost was calculated as accuracy on no-flanker trials minus accuracy on irrelevant-flanker trials, and contingent capture cost was calculated as accuracy on irrelevant-flanker trials minus accuracy on relevant-flanker trials.