Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;2014(5):CD002947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002947.pub2

Comparison 29. Chinese DJW versus diclofenac.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain VAS 0‐100 (total) 1 200 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 11.81 [‐9.67, 33.29]
2 Lequesne algofunctional index 1 200 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.28 [‐0.89, 1.45]
3 Participants (n) reported adverse events 1 200 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.66, 1.63]