Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;2014(5):CD002947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002947.pub2

Comparison 34. Ayurvedic RA‐II versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain VAS 0‐100 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.03 [‐1.18, ‐0.88]
2 WOMAC 0‐4 (Function) 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐5.80 [‐6.72, ‐4.88]
3 Participants (n) reported adverse events 1 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.69, 1.58]