Chopra 2004.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo control, 2 parallel groups. Duration 32 weeks | |
Participants | Randomised n=90, intervention n=45, control n=45. Midpoint (16 weeks) n=78. Completed n=62, intervention n=31, control n=31. Age 35+ years. OA knee (ACR criteria). Stable NSAIDs for 1 month at baseline. Not pregnant | |
Interventions | RA‐11: Ayurvedic medication, 2 capsules Placebo control: ingredients not reported Rescue medication not permitted Concurrent medication permitted: stable medication for concomitant diseases |
|
Outcomes | WOMAC 0‐4 (Asian ‐ Indian modification), VAS 0‐100, 50 feet walk time (seconds), physician global assessment 0‐4, patient global assessment 0‐4, early morning stiffness (minutes), knee swelling 0‐3 | |
Notes | Confirmatory study design, power 80%, alpha 0.05 (2 tailed). Did not report ethical oversight or compliance with guidelines. Results favour intervention. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Described as randomised: "...assigned to the active or placebo groups as per a predetermined computer generated randomisation schedule..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Adequate allocation concealment can be inferred: "A sealed copy of the randomization code was kept with the sponsor and the chief investigator but was not revealed to the subjects or the clinical staff until completion of the study." |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Active intervention and placebo not distinguished by look, taste, smell, packaging, or medication regimen |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Reported withdrawals. Included intention‐to‐treat analysis. Last observation carried forward to replace missing data (low risk) Three participants were withdrawn by the investigators due to "efficacy failure", which may confound results (unclear risk) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Pre‐determined levels of improvement (MCID) (low risk) Reported adverse events. Two participants in intervention group died, but these deaths were attributed to concomitant cardiovascular disease |
Other bias | Low risk | Diagnosis consistent with ACR criteria (low risk) |