Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;10(7):e0132158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132158

Table 7. Results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc: Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Robust statistics.

df χ2 CFI RMSEA SRMR
ML Robust ML Robust ML Robust ML
SDM-Q-9
Model 1 27 137.4*** 76.5*** 0.84 0.88 0.16 (0.13–0.19) 0.11 (0.08–0.14) 0.09
Model 2 20 77.8*** 41.9 * 0.91 0.94 0.14 (0.10–0.17) 0.08 (0.05–0.12) 0.06
Model 3 20 106.8*** 55.5*** 0.88 0.91 0.17 (0.13–0.20) 0.11 (0.07–0.14) 0.09
Model 4 14 56.2*** 27.4 * 0.93 0.96 0.14 (0.10–0.18) 0.08 (0.03–0.12) 0.06
SDM-Q-Doc
Model 1 27 74.8*** 56.9*** 0.94 0.93 0.09 (0.07–0.12) 0.08 (0.05–0.10) 0.06
Model 2 20 49.7*** 35.2 * 0.96 0.96 0.09 (0.06–0.12) 0.06 (0.03–0.09) 0.05
Model 3 20 57.9*** 40.7 ** 0.95 0.95 0.10 (0.07–0.13) 0.07 (0.04–0.10) 0.05
Model 4 14 33.9 ** 21.3 0.97 0.98 0.08 (0.05–0.12) 0.05 (0.00–0.09) 0.04

Recommended values: CFI (comparative fit index) >0.96, RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) ≤ 0.06 and SRMR (root mean square residual) ≤0.08. Values meeting cut off criteria are in bold.

* p-value < .05

** p-value < .01

*** p- value < .001.