Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;81(15):5073–5084. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04134-14

TABLE 1.

Nomenclature, land use, soil parameters, and bacterial abundance for the soils used in this study

Soil sample no. Land use Texture pH Organic content (g · kg−1)
C/N ratio CECa WHCb (%) Cultivable bacterial community (CFU · g−1 of soil [107])
C N
748 Agricultural field Silt loam 8.2 9.80 1.0 9.8 13.2 18.5 5.1
749 Agricultural field Clay loam 8.0 19.2 1.8 10.7 16.6 24.4 5.2
750 Agricultural field Clay 8.0 26.4 2.8 9.4 37.8 42.3 3.1
907 Prairie Loam 5.9 25.0 2.4 10.4 11.6 20.7 4.1
909 Agricultural field Silty clay 8.1 27.5 2.8 9.8 29.5 34.2 10.0
911 Prairie Silty clay 5.9 38.1 3.7 10.3 23.6 40.7 2.6
1003 Forest Silty clay 7.5 33.4 2.3 14.5 27.3 36.1 4.4
1005 Prairie Clay 6.7 35.3 3.9 9.1 31.4 46.6 6.0
1051 Prairie Sandy loam 5.4 26.2 2.5 10.5 8.8 18.8 4.4
1224 Agricultural field Clay 7.8 25.6 2.5 10.2 27.4 37.6 3.1
a

CEC, cation-exchange capacity.

b

WHC, water-holding capacity.