Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Nov 4;24(3):498–505. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0980

Table 3.

Characteristics of breast cancer cases by BRCA1/2 mutation status in Mexico City, Monterrey and Veracruz, 2007–2010

Characteristics Total Non carrier BRCA 1 BRCA 2 P valuea
n n = 810 n = 775 n = 20 n = 15
Age (years)
  Median 51.5 52 43 50.9
  Interquartile range (44.7, 59.4) (44.9, 59.7) (38.3, 49.4) (42.5, 56.2) <0.001
European Ancestry, n (%)b
  <25% 227 (28.0) 217 (28.0) 6 (30.0) 4 (26.7)
  25–50% 353 (43.6) 336 (43.4) 11 (55.0) 6 (40.0)
  51–75% 146 (18.0) 140 (18.1) 2 (10.0) 4 (26.7)
  76–100% 19 (2.3) 19 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.898
Breast cancer histology, n (%)b
  Ductal 499 (61.6) 473 (61.0) 15 (75.0) 11 (73.3)
  Lobular 99 (12.2) 96 (12.4) 0 (0.0) 3 (20.0)
  Ductal in situ 54 (6.7) 54 (7.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Mixed 32 (4.0) 32 (4.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Not classified 23 (2.8) 20 (2.6) 2 (10.0) 1 (6.7)
  Medullary 7 (0.9) 5 (0.6) 2 (10.0) 0 (0.0)
  Mucinous 4 (0.5) 4 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Lobular in situ 3 (0.4) 3 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Tubular/cribriform 3 (0.4) 3 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Papillary 3 (0.4) 3 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Apocrine 2 (0.2) 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Non-specified non-invasive 2 (0.2) 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Metaplastic 2 (0.2) 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.183
Stage, n (%)
  0 17 (2.1) 17 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  I 87 (10.7) 82 (10.6) 5 (25.0) 0 (0.0)
  II 363 (44.8) 353 (45.5) 5 (25.0) 5 (33.3)
  III 178 (22.0) 168 (21.7) 3 (15.0) 7 (46.7)
  IV 15 (1.9) 15 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  Non-classifiable 21 (2.6) 21 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.235
History of breast cancer in first degree, n (%)c
  No 752 (92.8) 722 (93.2) 17 (85.0) 13 (86.7)
  Yes 58 (7.2) 53 (6.8) 3 (15.0) 2 (13.3) 0.130
History of cancer in first degree, n (%)b,c
  No 552 (68.1) 535 (69.0) 9 (45.0) 8 (53.3)
  Yes 239 (29.5) 221 (28.5) 11 (55.0) 7 (46.7) 0.017
a

Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variables, Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables.

b

Percentages may not add up to 100% due to missing data.

c

We considered parents and siblings as first degree relatives.

d

Participants who did not know their number of siblings were excluded from the analysis.