Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 25;7(6):1194–1201. doi: 10.1111/irv.12140

Table 3.

HI titers induced by passive immunization, vaccination, and challenge with Mexican lineage H5N2 LPAI

Group Condition/immunization Mean serum HI antibody titer (Log2)a
Days from the start of the experiment
1 (Prime) 10 (Boost) 21 35 (Challenge) 50
1 Naïve ndb nd nd <e 5·8 (10/10)
2 Vaccine control nd nd 8·9 (9/9) 9·4 (9/9) 10·3 (9/9)
3 Laboratory antiserum, neat 5·0 (6/9)c nd 5·3 (5/10) 7·1 (10/10) 9·1 (10/10)
4 Laboratory antiserum, 1:2 dilution 4·2 (7/11) < 6·0 (6/11) 7·5 (10/11) 8·5 (11/11)
5 Laboratory antiserum, 1:2 dilution 3·9 (7/11) < 5·9 (7/11) 8·4 (11/11) 10·0 (11/11)
6 Field antiserum, neat 3·6 (7/10) nd 5·3 (3/10) 6·8 (8/10) 8·4 10/10)
7 Field antiserum, 1:2 dilution 2·8 (5/10)d < 4·9 (7/10) 7·7 (10/10) 9·6 (10/10)
8 Field antiserum, 1:2 dilution 3·3 (6/11) < 5·4 (10/11) 8·7 (11/11) 10·1 (11/11)
a

Expressed as the log2 of the reciprocal of the highest dilution that inhibited 4 hemagglutinating units of homologous virus. Results are presented as the arithmetic mean of positive sera (HI titer ≥1:10 dilution). The number of positive sera/total is indicated in parenthesis.

b

Not determined.

c

1 bird found dead from natural causes prior to study commencement.

d

1 bird was removed from the study after being transferred to the wrong area of biocontainment.

e

< Indicates all chickens at this time point had HI titers below the cutoff value.