Table 2.
Multilevel results predicting LOSROS and PWB using full maximum likelihood estimation (Model 1, N = 52; Model 2, N = 52)
| Dependent variable | Parameter | Var level | B | df | SEB | T | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWB Model 1 | Intercept | — | 139.96 | 46 | 3.78 | 37.02 | .00 |
| TIMEij | 1 | –.01 | 45 | 1.31 | .00 | .99 | |
| REL LENGTH | 2 | .00 | 162 | .10 | .02 | .98 | |
| SEP | 2 | –.23 | 162 | .38 | –.63 | .53 | |
| SEX | 2 | .64 | 162 | 1.65 | .39 | .70 | |
| INITIATE | 2 | –.3.11 | 162 | 1.47 | –2.11 | .04 | |
| RELSTAT | 1 | –3.26 | 162 | 1.80 | –1.80 | .07 | |
| LLSij | 1 | –.04 | 162 | .05 | –.73 | .50 | |
| PWBij | 1 | –.30 | 162 | .06 | –5.06 | .00 | |
| PWBi(j–1) | 1 | –.12 | 162 | .06 | –2.10 | .04 | |
| LOSROS Model 2 | Intercept | — | 39.21 | 46 | 5.44 | 7.21 | .00 |
| TIMEij | 1 | –.33 | 45 | 1.09 | –.31 | .76 | |
| TIMEij*TIMEij | 1*1 | –.01 | 39 | .15 | –.07 | .95 | |
| REL LENGTH | 2 | –.23 | 122 | .05 | –5.23 | .00 | |
| SEP | 2 | –.10 | 122 | .17 | –.58 | .56 | |
| SEX | 2 | –.24 | 122 | .72 | –.33 | .75 | |
| INITIATE | 2 | –.87 | 122 | .64 | –1.37 | .17 | |
| RELSTAT | 1 | .29 | 122 | .80 | .37 | .72 | |
| LLSij | 1 | .28 | 122 | .04 | 7.55 | .00 | |
| LOSROSij | 1 | –.22 | 122 | .07 | –3.35 | .00 | |
| LOSROSi(j–1) | 1 | .11 | 122 | .07 | 1.62 | .11 |
Note. Akaike information criterion fit statistic for Model 1 = 1920.7, Model 2 = 1879.5. See Table 1 for L2 variable descriptions. PWBij = Psychological Well-Being scale; LLSij = Liking and Loving Scale; LOSROSij = Loss of Self and Rediscovery of Self scale; PWBi(j–1) = PWB lagged by 1 week; LOSROSi(j–1) = LOSROS lagged by 1 week.