Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2014 Jul 28;5(2):155–167. doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2326408

TABLE 4.

Pitch and Yaw RMS Angular Displacement Predicted Using a Linear Mixed Effects Analysis

Pitch Value SE df t p
(Intercept) 7.404e-05 3.326e-05 46 2.226 0.030
Partner RMS PitchAmp 0.098 0.126 46 0.778 0.440
Actor is Male 2.081e-05 2.764e-05 46 0.753 0.455
Actor is Inpatient participant 1.877e-05 3.815e-05 46 0.492 0.625
Conflict 7.671e-05 3.755e-05 46 2.043 0.046
Actor is Inpatient participant X Conflict −4.517e-05 5.289e-05 46 −0.854 0.397

Observations = 68, Groups = 17, AIC = −933.9, BIC = −916.8.

Yaw

(Intercept) 6.894e-05 3.375e-05 46 2.042 0.047
Partner RMS YawAmp 0.273 0.122 46 2.240 0.029
Actor is Male −1.43e-05 2.951e-05 46 −0.285 0.776
Actor is Inpatient participant 3.694e-05 4.096e-05 46 0.901 0.371
Conflict 5.216e-05 4.048e-05 46 1.288 0.204
Actor is Inpatient participant X Conflict −1.343e-05 5.640e-05 46 −0.238 0.812

    Observations = 68, Groups = 17, AIC = −931.3, BIC = −914.2.

Inpatient participant” is the member of the couple that was in treatment for anger control and substance dependence.

Note: RMS: Root Mean Square, SE: Std Error, t: t-ratio, df: degrees of freedom, p: probability.