Skip to main content
. 2015 May;50(5):475–485. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02

Table 2A.

Functional Movement Screen and Y Balance Test Performance Classified by Injury History

Measure
Injury History
Ankle
Knee
Hip
Trunk
Shoulderb
Elbowb
Wristb
Handb
Functional Movement Screen/Y Balance Test, No. of screened athletes with previous injuriesa 90/100 59/64 18/18 32/35 29/NA 7/NA 25/NA 12/NA
Functional Movement Screen composite score
 Previous injury, mean ± SD 14.2 ± 2.4 13.9 ± 2.3 12.7 ± 3.1 14.1 ± 2.4 13.5 ± 2.6 12.1 ± 2.8 14.1 ± 2.2 12.3 ± 2.9
 No previous injury, mean ± SD 14.2 ± 2.5 14.4 ± 2.5 14.4 ± 2.3 14.2 ± 2.4 14.3 ± 2.4 14.3 ± 2.4 14.2 ± 2.5 14.3 ± 2.3
 P Value .88 .20 .005c .74 .10 .02c .80 .006c
 t Value −0.156 −1.292 −2.880 −0.0339 −1.655 −2.309 −0.253 −2.806
 95% Confidence interval of difference −0.798, 0.681 −1.277, 0.267 −2.880, −0.537 −1.106, 0.782 −1.790, 0.157 −3.968, −0.310 −1.176, 0.908 −3.411, −0.594
Y Balance Test composite score
 Previous injury, mean ± SD, % 101 ± 8 101 ± 7 100 ± 10 102 ± 10 NA NA NA NA
 No previous injury, mean ± SD, % 101 ± 8 101 ± 8 101 ± 8 101 ± 7 NA NA NA NA
 P Value .68 .49 .53 .37
 t Value 0.416 0.695 −0.635 0.902
 95% Confidence interval of difference −0.018, 0.027 −0.015, 0.032 −0.051, 0.026 −0.018, 0.042
Anterior reach asymmetry during the Y Balance Test
 Previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 4.5 ± 8.9 5.1 ± 11.6 3.1 ± 2.3 6.3 ± 14.3 NA NA NA NA
 No previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 4.2 ± 8.5 4.0 ± 6.9 4.5 ± 9.1 3.9 ± 6.9 NA NA NA NA
 P Value .78 .40 .51 .34
 t Value 0.274 0.841 −0.616 0.976
 95% Confidence interval of difference −2.162, 2.860 −1.512, 3.777 −5.701, 2.852 −2.593, 7.421
Posteromedial reach asymmetry during the Y Balance Test
 Previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 4.4 ± 9.6 3.1 ± 2.6 4.3 ± 2.9 5.8 ± 15.6 NA NA NA NA
 No previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 3.5 ± 3.2 4.4 ± 8.7 3.9 ± 7.6 3.5 ± 3.2 NA NA NA NA
 P Value .39 .24 .83 .40
 t Value 0.857 −1.171 0.211 0.864
 95% Confidence interval of difference −1.181, 2.994 −3.059, 0.895 −3.185, 3.947 −3.095, 7.675
Posterolateral reach asymmetry during the Y Balance Test
 Previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 3.6 ± 2.8 3.9 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 3.9 3.5 ± 2.7 NA NA NA NA
 No previous injury, mean ± SD, cm 3.7 ± 2.7 3.5 ± 2.6 3.6 ± 2.6 3.7 ± 2.8 NA NA NA NA
 P Value .91 .40 .78 .74
 t Value −0.116 0.851 0.290 −0.335
 95% Confidence interval of difference −0.842, 0.749 −0.514, 1.287 −1.695, 2.240 −1.198, 0.850

Abbreviation: NA, not analyzed.

a

Functional Movement Screen (Functional Movement Systems, Inc, Chatham, VA); Y Balance Test (Move2Perform, Evansville, IN).

b

Upper extremity injuries were not assessed for differences with performance on the Y Balance Test composite score or anterior, posteromedial, or posterolateral reach asymmetry during the Y Balance Test because this study focused on the lower quarter Y Balance Test.

c

Indicates difference.