Table 4. Typological counts given by Palma di Cesnola in 1963 and 1965–66 for the Laplacian types in which he conceivably could have subsumed Dufour bladelets and lunates.
| TYPOLOGICAL GROUPS | D-I | D-II | E-II/I (a) | E-III | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1963 preliminary report | |||||
| Pd1 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 |
| Ld1 | 3 | 9 | 5 | – | 17 |
| Punte | 3 | – | – | – | 3 |
| TOTAL cf. Dufour bladelets (b) | 6 | 10 | 5 | – | 21 |
| Gm | 1 | 7 | – | – | 8 |
| Pd2&Pd4 | – | 5 | 7 | – | 12 |
| Ld2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | 4 |
| Dt3-4, Dt7-8 | – | – | 3 | – | 3 |
| TOTAL cf. lunates (c) | 2 | 13 | 12 | – | 27 |
| 1965 monographic study of the 1963–64 lithics | |||||
| Pd1 | – | – | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Ld1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 17 |
| TOTAL cf. Dufour bladelets (b) | 3 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 20 |
| Gm | 1 | 4 | 51 | 10 | 66 |
| Pd2&Pd4 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 35 |
| Ld2 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 9 | 32 |
| Dt3-4, Dt7-8 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 12 |
| TOTAL cf. lunates (c) | 5 | 11 | 104 | 25 | 145 |
(a) Includes level E/D, corresponding to spit E1, which was considered part of E-II/I in 1963 and counted separately in 1965–66;
(b) Laplacian microlithic types defined by the application of marginal retouch/backing, direct, inverse or alternate;
(c) Laplacian types Pd2 and Pd4 are included given Palma di Cesnola’s classification of many lunates as Châtelperron points, especially in the 1963 report.