Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0129967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129967

Table 1. Genome-wide association between ROH and DPR or SCS.

Trait 1 BTA Position (Mb) 2 -log10(p) 3 Effect Position (Mb) F L 4 ROH-FPED 5
DPR 3 40.04–44.47 10.06 -0.41 40.89 0.55 10.53**
53.36–54.68 5.41 -0.33 54.65 0.27 1.27
7 42.54–45.14 4.28 -0.27 44.53 0.61 1.02
8 10.53–16.60 7.14 -0.42 13.81 0.20 7.01**
12 34.66–42.08 4.78 -0.40 40.37 0.13 5.26**
87.75–89.21 4.39 -0.33 89.09 0.20 9.27**
SCS 1 50.73–53.53 4.99 0.04 52.68 0.46 6.01**
132.26–135.40 5.17 0.05 134.65 0.27 8.93**
3 40.04–44.07 6.41 0.05 43.16 0.54 9.82**
4 8.07–12.51 9.04 0.07 8.07 0.26 6.43**
5 81.71–82.58 4.61 0.05 81.71 0.21 3.03**
7 40.27–45.14 4.65 0.04 41.19 0.61 0.96
13 58.05–59.22 5.32 -0.06 58.72 0.16 4.47*
21 11.08–12.75 5.42 0.06 11.08 0.16 6.82**
25.03–25.94 4.58 0.06 25.04 0.12 5.54**

1DPR = daughter pregnancy rate; SCS = somatic cell score.

2Regions was defined by genome-wide suggestive level of ROH-trait associations.

3Maximum association in the region.

4 F L = ROH of a SNP locus.

5**1%, *5%, genome-wide thresholds of association between ROH and FPED without considering stratification. The value shows-log10(p-value).