Table 1. A comparison of migrants, diaspora, and the spectrum of cancer metastases.
Social Demography | Cancer Demography | ||
---|---|---|---|
Imperial Diaspora | Trading Post Diaspora | Trading Post Diaspora → Oligometastasis | Imperial Diaspora → Cancer metastasis |
Large populations from a single homeland | Small population from a single homeland | Migrated from primary cancer in passive manner | Dispersed from a primary cancer in an active manner |
Settle multiple countries in aggressive manner | Settle in few countries while avoiding upsetting host country | Mild hypoxia and unlimited nutrients; Home niche conditions do not cause evolutionary clonal pressure | Hypoxia and lack of nutrients cause pressure to leave primary; Evolving home niche conditions cause undifferentiated, aggressive clones. |
Host country may or may not be receptive | Host country may or may not be receptive | Target organ may or may not be receptive | Target organ may or may not be receptive |
Group maintains collective memory of their homeland and culture | Group maintains collective memory of their homeland and culture | Pathologists can identify where a cancer cell originated | Pathologists can identify where a cancer cell originated |
Often assimilate the new homeland | Survive as distinct communities | Few distinct metastases | Multiple metastases as distinct masses |
Relationship with host country is uneasy and degenerates over time | Relationship with host country may be uneasy but is maintained over time | Immune system may not see a threat | Immune system tries to destroy the cancer cells |
Tied to the homeland by exchange of resources | Tied to the homeland by exchange of resources | Limited need for outside resources from homeland; fewer cells trafficking | Multiple cell-type trafficking, trafficking of resources/info |
Table adapted from Pienta et al. Clin Can Research, 2013 [10]