Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Aug;43(6):1131–1143. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9969-3

Table 2.

Odds Ratios for the Socialization and Selection Models Using Inverse Propensity Score Weights to Balance Groups

Socialization Comparisons W2 Target AU W3 Target AU Stability
TR Initiation vs. Control 18.58 2.37 4.84
Age 1.03 1.32
Gender 0.78 1.45
Fear (BIS) 0.78 0.68
Peer Delin 0.57 6.92
PR Initiation vs. Control 2.44 2.49 6.10
Age 1.84 1.57
Selection Comparison W2 TR Peer AU W3 TR Peer AU Stability
TR Initiation vs. Control 17.97 2.84 3.44
Age 1.72 1.69
Minor 1.47 0.99
W1 TR P Alc 5.23 1.07
T alc w- per 1.15 1.41
Peer Delin 3.29 1.16
Selection Comparison W2 PR Peer AU W3 PR Peer AU Stability
TR Initiation vs. Control 3.02 2.14 2.75
Age 1.54 2.14
T alc w- per 1.33 1.31
Peer Delin 1.30 3.27

Note. See Table 1 for abbreviations of Covariates. TR = target report, PR = Peer report. Column's 1 and 2 are odds ratios for each path model with outcome as column and IV and covariates as row. Column 3 is the odds ratio between W2 and W3 AU (for the socialization models, this is target AU and for the selection models it is peer AU).