Table 1.
Correlation coefficients between Cα RMSDs of decoys relative to the experimentally determined conformations and scores generated by the density score function, the self-RAPDF and other published scoring functions applied to the 4state_reduced decoy sets.
| Protein (PDB code) | Number of conformations | Empirical function [32] | Atomic KBP [8] | Shell [33] | RAPDF [7] | Density score | Self-RAPDF |
| 1ctf | 630 | 0.68 | 0.6 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.98 | 0.89 |
| 1r69 | 675 | 0.66 | 0.5 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 0.96 | 0.88 |
| 1sn3 | 660 | 0.53 | 0.5 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.96 | 0.89 |
| 2cro | 674 | 0.58 | 0.7 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.96 | 0.92 |
| 3icb | 653 | 0.77 | 0.8 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.92 |
| 4pti | 687 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.95 | 0.89 |
| 4rxn | 677 | 0.61 | 0.6 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.98 | 0.88 |
The density scores and the self-RAPDF scores have the best correlation coefficient with Cα RMSDs of decoys relative to experimentally determined conformations for all seven sets.