Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 18;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-4-8

Table 1.

Correlation coefficients between Cα RMSDs of decoys relative to the experimentally determined conformations and scores generated by the density score function, the self-RAPDF and other published scoring functions applied to the 4state_reduced decoy sets.

Protein (PDB code) Number of conformations Empirical function [32] Atomic KBP [8] Shell [33] RAPDF [7] Density score Self-RAPDF
1ctf 630 0.68 0.6 0.65 0.73 0.98 0.89
1r69 675 0.66 0.5 0.52 0.70 0.96 0.88
1sn3 660 0.53 0.5 0.42 0.47 0.96 0.89
2cro 674 0.58 0.7 0.58 0.76 0.96 0.92
3icb 653 0.77 0.8 0.74 0.85 0.98 0.92
4pti 687 0.46 0.5 0.34 0.49 0.95 0.89
4rxn 677 0.61 0.6 0.57 0.57 0.98 0.88

The density scores and the self-RAPDF scores have the best correlation coefficient with Cα RMSDs of decoys relative to experimentally determined conformations for all seven sets.