Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 15;5(5):1854–1861.

Table 3.

Relationship between rs2380205, rs2981579 and breast cancer risk (age adjusted)

SNP ID Model Genotype Control Case Without adjustment With adjustment

OR (95% CI) p-valuea OR (95% CI) p-valueb
rs2380205 Codominant C/C 164 (83.2%) 132 (73.3%) 1.00 0.039 1.00 0.055
T/C 32 (16.2%) 44 (24.4%) 1.69 (1.02-2.82) 1.69 (1.02-2.82)
T/T 1 (0.5%) 4 (2.2%) 5.19 (0.57-47.34) 5.19 (0.57-47.34)
Dominant C/C 164 (83.2%) 132 (73.3%) 1.00 0.021 1.00 0.034*
T/C-T/T 33 (16.8%) 48 (26.7%) 1.80 (1.09-2.96) 1.72 (1.04-2.86)
Recessive C/C-T/C 196 (99.5%) 176 (97.8%) 1.00 0.120 1.00 0.120
T/T 1 (0.5%) 4 (2.2%) 4.68 (0.51-42.49) 4.99 (0.53-47.41)
Over-dominant C/C-T/T 165 (83.8%) 136 (75.6%) 1.00 0.052 1.00 0.082
T/C 32 (16.2%) 44 (24.4%) 1.65 (0.99-2.75) 1.58 (0.94-2.65)
Log-additive --- --- --- 1.79 (1.12-2.84) 0.012* 1.73 (1.08-2.76) 0.020*
rs2981579 Codominant T/T 56 (28.6%) 55 (30.4%) 1.00 0.120 1 0.120
C/T 92 (46.9%) 96 (53%) 1.07 (0.67-1.71) 1.09 (0.68-1.76)
C/C 48 (24.5%) 30 (16.6%) 0.62 (0.34-1.12) 0.62 (0.34-1.13)
Dominant T/T 56 (28.6%) 55 (30.4%) 1.00 0.690 1 0.740
C/T-C/C 140 (71.4%) 126 (69.6%) 0.91 (0.59-1.42) 0.93 (0.59-1.45)
Recessive T/T-C/T 148 (75.5%) 151 (83.4%) 1.00 0.043* 1 0.042*
C/C 48 (24.5%) 30 (16.6%) 0.59 (0.35-0.99) 0.59 (0.35-0.99)
Over-dominant T/T-C/C 104 (53.1%) 85 (47%) 1.00 0.210 1 0.180
C/T 92 (46.9%) 96 (53%) 1.30 (0.87-1.95) 1.33 (0.88-2.00)
Log-additive --- --- --- 0.81 (0.61-1.08) 0.160 0.81 (0.61-1.09) 0.170
*

p value ≤ 0.05 indicates statistical significance;

Abbreviations: OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval;

a

p values were calculated from two-sided chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests for either genotype distribution.

b

p values were calculated by unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age, menopausal state and body mass index.