Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul 16;25(12):2072–2085. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00450

Table 2.

Significant differences between brain responses to an auditory 2-back task performed under blue light exposure and in darkness.

Side X, Y, Z Z Pcorrected
Value*

Blue light > Darkness

Ventrolateral prefrontal/frontopolar cortex R 28 52 6 4.72 0.032

Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) [a,b,c] R # 58 38 0 5.32 0.002
R 54 44 14 5.05 0.007
L −56 30 14 4.61 0.049

Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) [d,e,f,g] L −12 60 −2 6.88 < 0.001
R 10 54 18 6.19 < 0.001
L −12 50 30 6.05 <0.001
R 18 40 36 5.22 0.003
R 18 54 0 4.76 0.026
R 16 38 50 4.74 0.029
L −18 56 16 4.71 0.033

Precuneus (PREC) [h] R # 8 −74 58 6.59 < 0.001

Calcarine sulcus (CALC) [i] R 10 −82 −4 7.73 < 0.001

Superior occipital gyrus (SOG) [j] L # −18 −98 −4 7.71 < 0.001

Inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) [k] R # 32 −80 −22 5.03 < 0.008

Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) [l] R 10 38 10 4.78 0.024

Thalamus (pulvinar) (PULV) [m] L −10 −20 12 4.64 0.044

Darkness > Blue light

No significant voxel

Letters between [] correspond to letters of figure 3.

*

p-values corrected for multiple comparisons over the entire brain volume (Family Wise Error approach).

#

in these areas, an additional analyses showed cluster size of the significant difference was slightly reduced after applying an exclusive mask (p=0.05 uncorrected for multiple comparisons) for the brain response to the task blocks performed in complete darkness. All other clusters remained unaffected after mask application, supporting that blue light induces the significant recruitment of additional brain regions.