Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 27;53(38):10204–10208. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404527

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions for the formation of the sulfinate 2 a from 4-iodotoluene.[a] Inline graphic

Entry Ligand Reductant Yield [%][b]
1 PtBu3⋅HBF4 HCO2Na 68
2 PtBu3⋅HBF4 HCO2K 38
3 PtBu3⋅HBF4 (HCO2)2Ca 71
4 binap (HCO2)2Ca 23
5 dppf (HCO2)2Ca 84
6 dccp⋅(HBF4)2 (HCO2)2Ca 25
7 PCy3⋅HBF4 (HCO2)2Ca 88
8 PtBu2Me⋅HBF4 (HCO2)2Ca 95
9 PAd2Bu (HCO2)2Ca 96
10 PAd2Bu none 96
11[c] PAd2Bu none 99
12[d] PAd2Bu none 91
[a]

 Reaction conditions: Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %), ligand (20 mol %), DABSO (1.1 equiv), Et3N (3.0 equiv), iPrOH [0.2 m], 75 °C, 16 h.

[b]

 HPLC yield relative to an internal standard.

[c]

 Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), PAd2Bu (7.5 mol %), DABSO (0.6 equiv).

[d]

 Pd(OAc)2 (0.5 mol %), PAd2Bu (0.75 mol %). binap=2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)-1,1′-binaphthyl, dccp=1,3-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)propane, dppf=1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene.