Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 9;10(7):e0131875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131875

Table 2. Comparison of models extracted by the four evaluated contending methods: Mean values across contexts.

Global characteristics of the models are derived by applying RegrEx (with automated determination of λ), RegrEx-λ0 (i.e., RegrEx without regularization), Lee2012, iMAT and FastCORE. The abbreviations stand for the following: Card.- denotes mean cardinality, O- R, mean data-orphan ratio, ρ- (V,D), mean correlation between data and predicted flux values, R- (V,D), mean residual value between fluxes and data , I- J, mean Jaccard index to any other context, Shared, number of shared reactions across all contexts, and Total Exclusive represents total number of exclusively context-specific reactions across all contexts. Values in round brackets correspond to the standard deviation.

Card.¯ O¯ R ρ¯(V,D) R¯(V,D) I¯ J Shared Total Exclusive Total Card
RegrEx 842,91(55.14) 0,34(0.05) 0,42(0.07) 0,29(0.08) 0,56(0.04) 299 332 1618
RegrExλ0 1030,30(76.32) 0,47(0.04) 0,38(0.08) 0,28(0.08) 0,65(0.03) 490 239 1711
Lee2012 784,6 (26.53) 0,28(0.03) 0,13 (0.05) - 0,77 (0.01) 509 140 1092
FastCORE 1357,9(39.03) 0,50(0.04) - - 0,61(0.05) 503 230 2232
iMAT 1411(41.62) 0,42(0.04) -0.17(0.03) - 0,65(0.04) 611 210 2205