Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2015 Jan;13(1):7–18. doi: 10.1007/s12021-014-9222-9

Table 1.

Demographics of sample

Controla PDa P
Number 22 20
Age 61±13 64±9 P=0.40
Gender (F/M) 8 F/14 M 3 F/17 M P=0.22
Cognitive profile
  MMSE 28±2 26±3 p=0.02
  MOCA 27±3 24±5 p=0.04b
  Trail making test
    Part A 28±8 59±36 p=0.001b
    Part B 90±54 159±105 p=0.01b
  Stroop
    Word 97±5 92±11 p=0.04b
    Color 76±14 64±22 p=0.05b
    Interference 39±15 31±17 p=0.11
  JLO 26±5 23±6 p=0.08
Mood/Emotion
  Marin apathy scale 24±4 23±4 p=0.47
  Hamilton depression 8±5 13±7 p=0.01
Disease severity
  H/Y(Off Med) 3(1.5–5)
  H/Y (On Med) 2(1.5–3)
  UPDRS-OffMed
    Part I 4±3
    Part II 12±6
    Part III 34±14
    Part IV 3±2
    Total (Sum of I-IV) 52±21

H/Y Hoehn/Yahr

UPDRS Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale

a

Continuous Data and Discrete Data (such as age or values on scored tests) are displayed as mean value or score with standard deviation. Display of gender data is self-explanatory. Hoehn and Yahr score is a form of categorical data, and is displayed as median score and range. UPDRS score was obtained In an “off medication” state for all subjects

b

Unequal sample variance