Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2015 Mar 1;12(3):276–286. doi: 10.1177/1740774515571140

Table 3.

Key issues in deploying pragmatic cluster randomized trials in contemporary health systems

Issue type
Domains Ethical Regulatory Practical Responsible parties Next steps
Trial design Guidance
    Subject identification X X X FDA, NIH, ORHP
    Indirect participant/bystander X X Ethicists, trialists Scholarship
Gatekeepers and governance
    Gatekeepers X X Healthcare system leaders, research and/or clinical oversight committees, ethicists Research to include stakeholder perspectives, scholarship, develop and evaluate governance models
    Governance X X
Consent X X Ethicists, FDA, NIH, OHRP Guidance and policy development, research with stakeholders, scholarship, and evaluation
Ethical aspects
        Feasibility X X X
        Differential risk/benefit balance in arms X X X
Regulatory considerations
        When can consent be waived? X X
        Determination of minimal risk X X
        FDA regulation X
Institutional review boards HHS, OHRP, IRBs Guidance and policy development, curriculum development and implementation
    Education X X
    Local, shared, and central review X X X
Data monitoring Ethicists, statisticians, DMC experts Scholarship, guidance development
    Use in CRTs X X
    Stopping rules X X
    Data sources for interim analysis X X
Privacy X Office of Civil Rights, ethicists, CRT experts Policy development
    Application to CRTs X
    Alteration or waiver Use X
    Gatekeepers X X
Special populations Ethicists, FDA, NIH, OHR, CRT Researchers Guidance and policy development; think tanks, public hearings
    Vulnerable populations X X X

CRT: cluster-randomized trial; HHS: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; DMC: data monitoring committee; FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; IRB: institutional review board; NIH: National Institutes of Health; OHRP: Office for Human Research Protections