Table 3.
Issue type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domains | Ethical | Regulatory | Practical | Responsible parties | Next steps |
Trial design | Guidance | ||||
Subject identification | X | X | X | FDA, NIH, ORHP | |
Indirect participant/bystander | X | X | Ethicists, trialists | Scholarship | |
Gatekeepers and governance | |||||
Gatekeepers | X | X | Healthcare system leaders, research and/or clinical oversight committees, ethicists | Research to include stakeholder perspectives, scholarship, develop and evaluate governance models | |
Governance | X | X | |||
Consent | X | X | Ethicists, FDA, NIH, OHRP | Guidance and policy development, research with stakeholders, scholarship, and evaluation | |
Ethical aspects | |||||
Feasibility | X | X | X | ||
Differential risk/benefit balance in arms | X | X | X | ||
Regulatory considerations | |||||
When can consent be waived? | X | X | |||
Determination of minimal risk | X | X | |||
FDA regulation | X | ||||
Institutional review boards | HHS, OHRP, IRBs | Guidance and policy development, curriculum development and implementation | |||
Education | X | X | |||
Local, shared, and central review | X | X | X | ||
Data monitoring | Ethicists, statisticians, DMC experts | Scholarship, guidance development | |||
Use in CRTs | X | X | |||
Stopping rules | X | X | |||
Data sources for interim analysis | X | X | |||
Privacy | X | Office of Civil Rights, ethicists, CRT experts | Policy development | ||
Application to CRTs | X | ||||
Alteration or waiver Use | X | ||||
Gatekeepers | X | X | |||
Special populations | Ethicists, FDA, NIH, OHR, CRT Researchers | Guidance and policy development; think tanks, public hearings | |||
Vulnerable populations | X | X | X |
CRT: cluster-randomized trial; HHS: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; DMC: data monitoring committee; FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; IRB: institutional review board; NIH: National Institutes of Health; OHRP: Office for Human Research Protections