Menendez 1994 GMB.
Methods | Trial design: Cluster‐RCT Data collected: 1987 to 1990 Length of follow‐up: from first antenatal visit to third day after delivery Frequency of follow‐up: unclear but administration by traditional birth attendants was on weekly basis |
|
Participants | Parity: 0 Number: 230 Inclusion criteria: primigravidae resident in trial area Excluded: none stated |
|
Interventions |
Given by village people employed by the project Other: no information Administration supervised: yes |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Location: The Gambia Urban/rural: rural (trial area: 15 villages and 3 hamlets, 12 to 35 km from the town of Farafenni) Malaria transmission: seasonal HIV: no information provided Drug resistance: none reported Funding: no information |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as "a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled community based trial" but no details of the way allocation sequence was generated are provided. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "After consent had been obtained, women were randomized by compound of residence to receive weekly either one tablet of Maloprim or placebo." Comment: insufficient detail. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear. "Two hundred and thirty women were recruited into the study over a 3‐year period…" Afterwards, only 82 women are mentioned as participants in the maloprim group and 89 women in the placebo group. Overall attrition rate 59/230 (25.7%) The total number of women with incomplete outcome data 28/230 (12.2%). Four women had an abortion, 17 had stillbirths, five women died, and 2 other women (0.9%) were lost to follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No selective reporting observed. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other source of bias identified. |