Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 10;2014(10):CD000169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000169.pub3

Parise 1998i KEN.

Methods Trial design: Quasi‐RCT
Data collected:1994 to 1996
Length of follow‐up: from first antenatal visit to delivery; for infants: follow‐up at 3‐7 days of life and at 6 weeks of age
Frequency of follow‐up: at two and four weeks after enrolment and then monthly until delivery
Participants Parity: para 0‐1
Number: 2077
Inclusion criteria: antenatal clinic attendees; first or second pregnancy
Excluded: prior ADRs to sulfa‐containing or other antimalarial medications
Interventions
  1. SP: treatment dose, repeated in late pregnancy (2 doses); not administered at intervals of less than 1 month

  2. No intermittent preventive treatment, SP given with recent history of fever or parasitaemia


Other: 200 mg ferrous sulphate and 5 mg folic acid daily
Administration supervised: Yes
Outcomes
  1. Maternal anaemia

  2. Mean haemoglobin

  3. Placental infection

  4. Birthweight

  5. Preterm birth

  6. Stillbirth

  7. Neonatal death

Notes Location: Kenya
Urban/rural: urban
Malaria transmission: hyperendemic area
Drug resistance: chloroquine
HIV seroprevalence : 2SP ‐ 26.9% (53/196); Case management ‐ 26.9% (57/212)
Funding: UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (ID No. 940060); the US Agency for International Development through the Health and Human Resources Analysis for Africa (HHRAA) Project through a Participating Agency Service Agreement (PASA number AOT‐0483‐P‐HI‐2171)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk "Women were systematically assigned to receive one of three regimens using a rotating assignment based on day of clinic visit."
Comment: allocation was not random.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Allocation schedule not concealed.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding. Women were systematically assigned to receive either two‐dose SP with treatment doses at enrolment
and again early in the third trimester, or case management (CM).
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk "Six hundred ninety‐nine women (34%) were lost to follow‐up during pregnancy because they moved out of the study area or failed to return for follow‐up and the study team was unable to locate their houses."
Data was not available for 36.5% (248/680) women in the 2 SP and 35.9% (264/736) women in the case management group.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial protocol was available. No selective reporting observed.
Other bias Low risk No apparent risk.