Parise 1998i KEN.
Methods | Trial design: Quasi‐RCT Data collected:1994 to 1996 Length of follow‐up: from first antenatal visit to delivery; for infants: follow‐up at 3‐7 days of life and at 6 weeks of age Frequency of follow‐up: at two and four weeks after enrolment and then monthly until delivery |
|
Participants | Parity: para 0‐1 Number: 2077 Inclusion criteria: antenatal clinic attendees; first or second pregnancy Excluded: prior ADRs to sulfa‐containing or other antimalarial medications |
|
Interventions |
Other: 200 mg ferrous sulphate and 5 mg folic acid daily Administration supervised: Yes |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Location: Kenya Urban/rural: urban Malaria transmission: hyperendemic area Drug resistance: chloroquine HIV seroprevalence : 2SP ‐ 26.9% (53/196); Case management ‐ 26.9% (57/212) Funding: UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (ID No. 940060); the US Agency for International Development through the Health and Human Resources Analysis for Africa (HHRAA) Project through a Participating Agency Service Agreement (PASA number AOT‐0483‐P‐HI‐2171) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | "Women were systematically assigned to receive one of three regimens using a rotating assignment based on day of clinic visit." Comment: allocation was not random. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Allocation schedule not concealed. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding. Women were systematically assigned to receive either two‐dose SP with treatment doses at enrolment and again early in the third trimester, or case management (CM). |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | "Six hundred ninety‐nine women (34%) were lost to follow‐up during pregnancy because they moved out of the study area or failed to return for follow‐up and the study team was unable to locate their houses." Data was not available for 36.5% (248/680) women in the 2 SP and 35.9% (264/736) women in the case management group. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The trial protocol was available. No selective reporting observed. |
Other bias | Low risk | No apparent risk. |