Table 1.
Demographic and BCI performance data for all subjects
| Subject | Age/Sex | Time Since Stroke (mo) | Stroke Type | Stroke Location | Clinical Presentation | NIH Stroke Scale | Barthel Index | Geriatric Depress ion Score | FM-LM Score (first/last assessm ent) | Walking Aids Used at Time of Study | Previous Lower Limb FES Use | BCI-NMES Runs Completeda | Overall Decoding Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 83/M | 29 | I | L basal ganglia | R hemiparesis | 5 | 90 | 0 | 23/27 | AFO | N | 107 | 82.7 |
| S2 | 59/F | 9 | I | R internal capsule | L hemiplegia | 8 | 60 | 4 | 21/25 | AFO + C | N | 98 | 79.1 |
| S3 | 35/M | 24 | H | R corona radiata | L hemiparesis | 6 | 100 | 0 | 29/31 | AFO | Y | 119 | 61.6 |
| S4 | 75/M | 9 | I | L putamen/corona radiata | R hemiparesis | 7 | 75 | 7 | 18/21 | AFO + W | N | 111 | 74.5 |
| S5 | 51/M | 8 | I | L basal ganglia | R foot drop | 3 | 100 | 6 | 25/26 | AFO | N | 113 | 84.2 |
| S6 | 71/M | 102 | I | R basal ganglia | L hemiparesis | 2 | 100 | 1 | 25/29 | AFO | N | 97 | 75.5 |
| S7 | 66/F | 23 | I | L pons | R hemiparesis | 5 | 95 | 4 | 21/26 | AFO + C | N | 103 | 86.9 |
| S8 | 38/F | 24 | H | R basal ganglia | L hemiparesis | 5 | 70 | 1 | 23/22 | AFO + C | N | 80 | 84.1 |
| S9 | 60/M | 19 | H | R thalamus | L hemiparesis | 5 | 100 | 2 | 26/26 | AFO | N | 82 | 88.6 |
M: male, F: female, I: ischemic, H: hemorrhagic, L: left, R: right AFO: ankle-foot orthosis, C: cane, W: walker, Y: yes, N: no
aOut of a total of 910 runs, 864 were deemed significant (α = 0.01) by comparison to Monte-Carlo Simulation