Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1102–1111. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000852

Table 5.

Estimates of Intervention Effect Size

Category Percent
Relative Risk
Reductiona
Trials reporting on ICU admissions (n = 3)
  Mean (sd) 37 (23)
  Median (IQR) 50 (11, 51)

Trials reporting on ICU length of stay
  Intervention in acute care setting (n = 1) 52
  Intervention in outpatient setting (n = 1) No change
  Intervention in ICU settingb (n = 14)
    Mean (sd) 26 (23)
    Median (IQR) 22 (48, 0)
  Intervention in ICU setting restricted to patient/provider targets (n = 10)
    Mean (sd) 33 (23)
    Median (IQR) 33 (49, 18)

IQR = interquartile range.

a

Mean relative risk reduction value used from each trial except for Lilly trial (33), which only reported a median reduction in length of stay.

b

For trials with separate values for survivors and decedents, we selected the relative risk reduction for decedents.