Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):8156–8162. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8156

Table 3.

Summary of treatment regimen, local control, progression-free survival, overall survival and late toxicity in previous studies compared with the present study

Ref. No. of patients SBRT dose (Gy/No. of fractions) Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy LC (%) PFS (mo) OS (mo) Toxicity (G2) (%)
Didolkar et al[17] 85 15-30 Gy/3 Sequential 91.7 - 18.6 from diagnosis 8.6 from SBRT 22
Polistina et al[18] 23 30 Gy/3 Prior 82.6 7.3 10.6 None
Mahadevan et al[19] 39 24-36 Gy/3 Sequential 85 15 20 from diagnosis 9
Schellenberg et al[20] 16 25 Gy/1 Sequential 81 9 11.4 from diagnosis 47
Hoyer et al[21] 22 45 Gy/3 Sequential 57 4.8 5.7 from diagnosis 18
Koong et al[22] 15 15-25 Gy/1 No 77 2 11 from diagnosis None
Chang et al[23] 77 25 Gy/1 Prior 84 - 11.4 from diagnosis 13
Schellenberg et al[24] 20 25 Gy/1 Sequential 94 9.2 11.8 from diagnosis 20
Rwigema et al[25] 71 18-25 Gy/1 No 64.8 - 10.3 10
Pollom et al[26] 167 25-33 Gy/1-5 Sequential or concurrent - - 13.6 from diagnosis 12.3
Moningi et al[27] 88 20-33 Gy/5 Gemcitabine, cisplatin, FOLFIRINOX or paclitaxel - 9.8 18.4 from diagnosis 5.7 G23.4 G3
Gurka et al[28] 38 25-30 Gy/5 Gemcitabine, mFOLFOX or capecitabine 79 9.2 14.3 from diagnosis -
Present study 25 30-36 Gy/3 or 42-48Gy/4 4 patients, Gemcitabine - - M0 group 13.5 M1 group 8.5 from SBRT 4

LC: Local control; OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival; SBRT: Stereotactic body radiotherapy.