Skip to main content
. 2015 May 28;7(3):254–258. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2015.51871

Table 1.

Toxicity and outcomes of salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer recurrence after external beam irradiation

Study, year Salvage therapy n Median follow-up (months) Grade 3/4 toxicity Outcome
Łyczek et al. [10] HDR 30 Gy/3 fx/3 impl 115 No information 12.2% GU 0.9% GI 46% bPFS in patients with PSA < 6
18% bPFS in patients with PSA > 6
Scala et al. [11] HDR 36 Gy/6 fx/2 impl 10 18.5 70% grade 2 or greater 70% dfs
Jo et al. [12] HDR 22 Gy/2 fx/1 impl 11 29 0% 63% bNED
Morikawa et al. [13] HDR 32 Gy/4 fx/1 impl 29 22 0% 79% bDFS
Chen et al. [14] HDR 36 Gy/6 fx/2 impl 52 59.6 2% 51% 5y bDFS
Lahmer et al. [15] PDR 60 Gy/2 impl 18 21 0-17% 57% PSA-rfsp
Kukiełka et al. [16] HDR + IHT 30 Gy/3 fx/3 impl 25 13 0% 74% 2y bDFS

PSA-rfsp – PSA-recurrence free survival probability, bDFS – biochemical disease-free survival, bPFS – biochemical progression-free survival, bNED – biochemical no evidence of disease, HDR – high-dose-rate brachytherapy, PDR – pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy, IHT – interstitial hyperthermia; impl – implantation