Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;16(4):889–898. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.889

Fig. 3. Case of disagreement on injury morphology by readers.

Fig. 3

Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) disruption was clearly demonstrable and was agreed upon by all six readers during first and second reviews of T2-weighted non-fat saturation (A) and short time inversion recovery sagittal images (B) and T2-weighted axial scan (C) of 33-year-old man (arrows). However, readers failed to agree on injury morphology: "compression" by one, "burst" by one, and "distraction" by four readers during first review and "compression" by one, "burst" by two, and "distraction" by three on second review.