Skip to main content
editorial
. 2015 Jul;3(11):149. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.06.15

Table 1. Comparison of Chang et al. (1) data with SABR results for medically-operable patients with esNSCLC.

Study N Eligible Treatment Age Median follow-up (months) Local or lobar failure Regional failures Distant failures PFS OS Toxicity
Chang (1),
Lobectomy Cohort Phase III
27 Operable
T1-2a N0
Lobectomy 67 35.4 3-year
0%
3-year
4%
3-year
9%
3-year
80%
3-year
79%
Grade ≥3 (48%) 1 Grade 5
Chang (1),
SABR Cohort Phase III
31 Operable
T1-2a N0
54 Gy (3 fractions);
50 Gy (3 fractions);
60 Gy (3 fractions)
67 40.2 3-year
4%
3-year
10%
3-year
3%
3-year
86%
3-year
95%
Grade 3 (10%)
Timmerman (6),
RTOG 0618 Phase II
26 Operable
T1-2 N0
54 Gy (3 fractions) 72 25 2-year
20%
2-year
12%
2-year
15%
2-year
65%
2-year
84%
Grade 3 (16%)
Lagerwaard (7),
Retrospective
177 Operable
T1-T2 N0
60 Gy (risk-adapted to 3, 5, or 8 fractions) 76 31.5 3-year
7%
3-year
10%
3-year
10%
3-year
81%
3-year
85%
Grade ≥3 pneumonitis in 2% and rib fracture 3%
Onishi (8),
Retrospective
87 Operable
T1-2 N0
45-72.5 Gy at isocenter (3-10 fractions) 74 55 5-year
13%
5-year
15%
5-year
25%
NR 5-year
70%
Grade 3 (8.2%)

SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; esNSCLC, early stage non-small cell lung cancer; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NR, not reported.