Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 13;6:878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00878

Table 3.

Analyses of variance for response times in Experiment 1.

Anchor Source df F graphic file with name fpsyg-06-00878-i002.jpg η2 p
/dɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 17.8 1 0.29 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 198.2 1 0.46 0.000
Distance with type 2, 20 1.6 1 0.01 0.230
/dƷɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 23.8 1 0.30 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 348.7 1 0.41 0.000
Distance with type 1.6, 16.6 7.2 0.83 0.04 0.004
/kɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 17.8 1 0.41 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 129.2 1 0.31 0.000
Distance with type 1.4, 14.2 3.9 0.71 0.02 0.055
/lɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 1.9, 17.4 17.8 0.97 0.11 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 9 88.6 1 0.65 0.000
Distance with type 2, 18 0.9 1 0.01 0.436
/nɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 23.0 1 0.30 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 80.4 1 0.42 0.000
Distance with type 2, 20 0.8 1 0.00 0.471
/tɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 31.8 1 0.43 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 70.9 1 0.26 0.000
Distance with type 1.4, 14.2 0.1 0.71 0.00 0.819
/Ʒɑ/ Distance (far, near, same) 2, 20 17.3 1 0.27 0.000
Type (natural, synthetic) 1, 10 147.9 1 0.36 0.000
Distance with type 2, 20 6.3 1 0.04 0.008

Each of the anchor stimuli and its triplet set were analyzed separately (see text).