Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Vis cogn. 2015 Apr 10;23(1-2):313–335. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1023387

Figure 4. Across-subject correlation analysis of cue utilization and attentional preparation.

Figure 4

Across-subjects correlation between the effect of reward (positive numbers represent faster IEs for reward versus no-reward trials) and the cued distracter-expectation cost in the reward-context blocks of Experiment 2. The shaded grey area represents the 95% confidence interval of the linear fit. The relationship between the reward effect and cued distracter-expectation cost indicates that subjects who used the cue information more, reflected by showing a larger reward effect, also showed a greater preparation for distracter possibility, as indicated by a larger cued distracter-expectation cost.