Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132250

Table 8. Change of N2MBW results after reanalysis with different signal delay times.

Settings LCI FRC Scond Scond*VT Sacin Sacin*VT
Individual signal changes
O2 delay -20ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑ ↑↑
O2 delay -40ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑
O2 delay -60ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑ ↑↑
O2 delay +20ms ↓↓ ↑↑
O2 delay +40ms ↓↓ ↑↑ (↓) (↓) ↓↓ ↓↓
O2 delay +60ms ↓↓ ↑↑ ↓↓ ↓↓
CO2 delay -10ms ↓↓ ↑↑ (↓) (↓)
CO2 delay +10ms ↑↑ ↓↓
Simultaneous signal changes using different delays
O2 -100ms and CO2 -10ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑ ↑↑
O2 +100ms and CO2 +10ms ↓↓ ↑↑ ↓↓ ↓↓
O2 -100ms and CO2 +10ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑ ↑↑
O2 +100ms and CO2 -10ms ↓↓ ↑↑ ↓↓ ↓↓ ↓↓ ↓↓
Simultaneous signal changes using similar delays
O2 -40ms and CO2 -40ms ↑↑ ↓↓ ↑↑
O2 +40ms and CO2 +40ms ↓↓ ↑↑ ↓↓ ↓↓
O2 +80ms and CO2 +80ms ↓↓ ↑↑ ↓↓ ↓↓

Change of N2MBW test results of 30 children after simulation with changed signal delay times. Results of standard N2MBW test were compared to the test with changed setting parameter by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and marked as follows: ↓↓ difference of p < 0.001, ↓ p < 0.01, (↓) p < 0.05, ↔ no significant change. Of note, for simultaneous signal changes using similar time steps, delays between O2 and CO2 sensor were kept constant.