Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 8;187(10):725–733. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150209

Table 2:

Calibration of the HOMR score in the derivation and validation cohorts

Calibration measure Cohort
Derivation n = 87* Ontario n = 84* Alberta n = 77* Boston n = 65*
% of HOMR scores for which 95% CI of observed risk of death included expected risk of death 66.7 31.0 57.1 53.8
Difference between observed and expected % of patients dead at 1 yr
 Relative, %
  Median (IQR) 0.05 (0.02 to 0.25) 0.17 (0.06 to 0.26) 0.09 (0.03 to 0.54) 0.26 (0.06 to 1)
  Range 0–2.02 0–226.86 0–1.14 0–5.27
 Absolute, %
  Median (IQR) 0.2 (0.02 to 0.72) 0.33 (0.09 to 2.78) 0.34 (0.03 to 1.95) 0.34 (0.05 to 1.76)
  Range 0–4.46 0–8.72 0–11.1 0–39.35

Note: Boston = Brigham and Women’s Hospital, CI = confidence interval, HOMR = Hospital-patient One-year Mortality Risk, IQR = interquartile range.

*

n refers to the number of discrete values of the HOMR score represented by at least 1 patient within the cohort.

Relative difference was calculated as the absolute difference divided by the expected % dead at 1 yr.

Absolute difference was calculated as observed % dead at 1 yr minus expected % dead at 1 yr.