Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2013 Mar 20;43(5):1252–1263. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242940

Table I.

Summary of OT-I transfer experimentsa

recipient mice source # of OT-I transferred genotype of OT-I Virus pfu # of mice # of rejectorsb % rejected
B6.SJL (CD45.1+) Taconic 600+ CD45.2 GFP-SL8 2×105 33 28 84.85%
B6.SJL (CD45.1+) Taconic 600 CD45.2 K181-ova 2×105 7 6 85.71%
B6.SJL (CD45.1+) Jackson 600+ CD45.2 & CD45.1/.2 GFP-SL8 2×105 25 4 16%
CD45.1/.2 in house 600 CD45.2 GFP-SL8 2×105 19 7 36.84%
B6 (CD45.2+) Jackson 6 - 3,600 CD45.1/.2 GFP-SL8 2×105 32 11 34.38%
B6 (CD45.2+) Jackson 600 CD45.1/.2 GFP-SL8 2×104 4 3 75%
B6 (CD45.2+) Jackson 600 CD45.1/.2 GFP-SL8 50 7 2 28.57%
μMT (CD45.2+) Jackson 600 CD45.1/.2 GFP-SL8 2×105 6 4 66.67%
a

Shown is a summary of OT-I transfer experiments including the genotype of the donor and recipient animals, the origin of recipient mice, the number and genotype of OT-Is transferred, the virus and titer used to infect recipients and the number and frequency of mice that retained or lost their OT-Is.

b

Experiments were not always carried for the same amount of time. It is possible that more mice would have lost OT-Is given more time.