Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;13:226. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0540-y

Table 3.

The differentially expressed metabolites between MD and HC group

Metabolites Metabolic pathway Training set Test set
Log2(FC)a P valueb Log2(FC)a P valueb
Glucose Glycosis 0.50 1.000 0.34 0.239
Glucose 6-phosphate Glycosis 0.74 0.228 0.38 1.000
Fructose 6-phosphate Glycosis 0.99 0.019 0.18 1.000
Fructose Glycosis 0.08 1.000 0.29 0.198
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Glycosis −0.09 0.907 −0.25 0.802
Dihydroxyacetone phosphate Glycosis 0.71 0.000 −0.79 0.004
Glycerol 3-phosphate Glycosis −0.09 1.000 −0.10 1.000
Glycerate 3-phosphate Glycosis −0.71 0.190 −0.28 0.692
Pyruvate Glycosis 0.34 0.606 0.22 1.000
Lactic acid Glycosis −0.15 1.000 −0.31 0.239
Citric acid TCA −0.09 1.000 −0.11 1.000
Succinic acid TCA 0.07 1.000 0.71 0.003
Ribose 5-phosphate Pentose phosphate pathway −0.03 1.000 −0.16 1.000

Values given in bold denote statistically significant results (P < 0.05).

MD major depression, HC healthy controls, FC fold change, TCA tricarboxylic acid cycle.

aA negative log2(FC) indicated significantly lower expression in major depressive subjects compared to healthy controls; a positive log2(FC) indicated significantly higher expression in major depressive subjects compared to healthy controls.

bThese data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test between two groups of each cohort.