Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2015 Jan 13;83(3):411–427. doi: 10.1002/prot.24746

Table 4.

Test on PREFAB database.

Method All (1682/23.0) Set 1 (420/6.8) Set 2 (421/14.9) Set 3 (420/23.1) Set 4 (421/48.4)
PROMALS 80.3 56.7 80.2 90.0 94.2
SFESA (O)+PROMALS 80.4 57.4 80.5 89.9 93.8
SFESA (O+G)+PROMALS 80.1 57.6 80.3 89.4 93.2
SFESA (O+G+M)+PROMALS 80.3 57.3 81.1 89.7 93.1
SFESA (O+G+M+S)+PROMALS 81.3 58.7 81.7 90.5 94.1
HHpred 78.0 46.6 80.2 90.3 94.7
SFESA (O)+HHpred 78.0 46.7 80.2 90.3 94.7
SFESA (O+G)+HHpred 78.3 47.2 80.6 90.5 94.9
SFESA (O+G+M)+HHpred 78.6 47.8 81.3 90.6 94.8
SFESA (O+G+M+S)+HHpred 78.6 47.7 81.1 90.6 94.9
CNFpred 80.5 56.3 81.7 89.6 94.5
SFESA (O)+CNFpred 81.0 57.1 82.1 90.2 94.6
SFESA (O+G)+CNFpred 81.2 57.3 82.3 90.3 94.7
SFESA (O+G+M)+CNFpred 81.2 57.2 82.8 90.3 94.6
SFESA (O+G+M+S)+CNFpred 81.3 57.5 82.8 90.4 94.6

Average Q-score is reported. The total 1682 PREFAB alignments are divided to four semi-equalsized sets according to sequence identity of the PROMALS alignment. The number of alignments and the average sequence identity are in parenthesis beneath the set names. Bold indicates the best performance in the subsection. Bold with underscore indicates the overall best performance in one column.