Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0066-5

Table 2.

Linear regression of echocardiographic parameters on the Sokolow-Lyon index

Crude betaa (95 % CI) p Adjusted betaa,b (95 % CI) p
LVMI (g/m2) 4.19 (1.40–6.99) 0.0033 7.02 (4.49–9.54) <0.0001
LVIDd (cm/m2) 0.10 (0.08–0.12) <0.0001 0.06 (0.04–0.08) <0.0001
PWTd (cm) −0.01 (−0.02–0.00) 0.1533 0.01 (0.00–0.02) 0.1078
SWTd (cm) −0.01 (−0.02–0.00) 0.1435 0.01 (0.00–0.02) 0.0927
Dichotomized outcome for impaired echocardiographic LVH parameters [13] (odds ratios)
LVMI 1.37 (0.67–2.79) 0.3892 1.59 (0.74–3.42) 0.233
LVIDd 1.93 (0.81–4.61) 0.1379 1.24 (0.48–3.16) 0.6572
PWTd 2 (0.48–8.29) 0.341 2.62 (0.59–11.59) 0.2041
SWTd 2.25 (0.54–9.32) 0.2633 2.66 (0.6–11.81) 0.1993

SLI Sokolow-Lyon index, LVMI left ventricular mass index, LVIDd left-ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole index, PWTd left-ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole, SWTd septal wall thickness at end-diastole, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval

aadjusted for sex, sport index, smoking status, NT-pro BNP, low density lipoprotein, arterial hypertension, waist-to-hip ratio, diabetes mellitus, regular intake of antiarrhythmic medication, beta blockers and digitalis glycosides

bBeta gives the increase of the respective echocardiographic parameter per mV increase of the SLI