Ref (type) | Population | Outcome, Interventions | Results and statistical analysis | Effect size | Favours |
Time to healing | |||||
[26]
RCT |
47 people with partial-thickness burns (burn sites of individual randomised to either PVP-I hydrogel or silver sulfadiazine cream) |
Mean time to wound closure
9.9 days with PVP-I hydrogel 11.9 days with silver sulfadiazine cream |
P = 0.015 RCT not blinded because of characteristic colour of PVP-I hydrogel |
Effect size not calculated | PVP-I hydrogel |
Number of people healed | |||||
[11]
Systematic review |
80 people with second-degree burns Data from 1 RCT |
Number of people healed
day 6
6/40 (15%) with iconic hydrogel dressing 4/40 (10%) with silver sulfadiazine cream |
RR 1.50 95%CI 0.46 to 4.91 P = 0.50 The study[25] had unclear blinding |
Not significant | |
[11]
Systematic review |
80 people with second-degree burns Data from 1 RCT |
Number of people healed
day 9
20/40 (50%) with iconic hydrogel dressing 10/40 (10%) with silver sulfadiazine cream |
RR 2.00 95%CI 1.08 to 3.72 P = 0.028 The study[25] had unclear blinding |
Small effect size | iconic hydrogel dressing |
[11]
Systematic review |
80 people with second-degree burns Data from 1 RCT |
Number of people healed
day 12
32/40 (80%) with iconic hydrogel dressing 19/40 (48%) with silver sulfadiazine cream |
RR 1.68 95%CI 1.17 to 2.42 P = 0.0046 The study[25] had unclear blinding |
Small effect size | iconic hydrogel dressing |
[11]
Systematic review |
80 people with second-degree burns Data from 1 RCT |
Number of people healed
day 15
36/40 (90%) with iconic hydrogel dressing 31/40 (78%) with silver sulfadiazine cream |
RR 1.16 95%CI 0.95 to 1.41 P = 0.14 The study[25] had unclear blinding |
Not significant | |
Wound infection | |||||
[11]
Systematic review |
80 people with second-degree burns Data from 1 RCT |
Infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa requiring antibiotic therapy
0/40 (0%) with iconic hydrogel dressing 1/40 (3%) with silver sulfadiazine cream |
RR 0.33 95% CI 0.01 to 7.95 P = 0.50 |
Not significant | |
Anti-infective efficacy (clinician-rated) | |||||
[26]
RCT |
47 people with partial-thickness burns (burn sites of individual randomised to either PVP-I hydrogel or silver sulfadiazine cream) |
Anti-infective efficacy (rated as 'excellent' by clinician)
54% with PVP-I hydrogel 26.1% with silver sulfadiazine cream Absolute numbers not reported |
Significance not assessed RCT not blinded because of characteristic colour of PVP-I hydrogel |
||
[26]
RCT |
47 people with partial-thickness burns (burn sites of individual randomised to either PVP-I hydrogel or silver sulfadiazine cream) |
Anti-infective efficacy (rated as 'good' by clinician)
43.5% with PVP-I hydrogel 67.4% with silver sulfadiazine cream Absolute numbers not reported |
Significance not assessed RCT not blinded because of characteristic colour of PVP-I hydrogel |
||
Cosmetic result (clinician-rated) | |||||
[26]
RCT |
47 people with partial-thickness burns (burn sites of individual randomised to either PVP-I hydrogel or silver sulfadiazine cream) |
Cosmetic items (smoothness, elasticity, and appearance; rated as 'excellent' on clinician global assessment scale)
37% with PVP-I hydrogel 13% with silver sulfadiazine cream Absolute numbers not reported |
Significance not assessed RCT not blinded because of characteristic colour of PVP-I hydrogel |