Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0132343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132343

Table 4. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

Endpoint Factor Comparison Hazard Ratio 95% LCL 95% UCL P-value
RFS (N = 674,E = 306) SPINK1 Neg vs. Pos 2.84 1.17 6.90 0.02
Margin Pos vs. Neg 1.78 1.41 2.24 <0.0001
SVinv Yes vs. No 2.37 1.63 3.43 <0.0001
Gleason 3+4 vs. < = 6 1.46 1.10 1.95 0.009
4+3 vs. < = 6 2.09 1.49 2.93 < .0.0001
8–10 vs. < = 6 1.82 1.26 2.65 0.002
Log(pre-op PSA) 1 unit increase 1.56 1.31 1.86 < .0.0001
DSS (N = 929,E = 46) Gleason 3+4 vs. < = 6 2.69 1.11 6.49 0.03
4+3 vs. < = 6 3.67 1.34 10.07 0.01
8–10 vs. < = 6 6.27 2.41 16.31 0.0002
Log(pre-op PSA) 1 unit increase 1.80 1.23 2.64 0.003
OS (N = 940, E = 58) Gleason 3+4 vs. < = 6 0.88 0.44 1.73 0.71
4+3 vs. < = 6 1.11 0.44 2.77 0.82
8–10 vs. < = 6 3.25 1.70 6.24 0.0004
Age 1 unit increase 1.06 1.02 1.10 0.006

N = total number of patients, E = number of patients with events

LCL = Lower Confidence Limit, UCL = Upper Confidence Limit