Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 24;70(3):443–452. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu024

Table 2.

Adjusted Models Showing Association Between Socioeconomic Position (SEP) and Health-Seeking Behavior Related to Hearing Loss in Six Stages of Health-Seeking Process

OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Phase A 1. Self-reported hearing difficultya, n = 8,230 2. Told health professional, n = 3,203
SEP 0.87*** 0.83–0.91 0.99 0.92–1.07
Gender
 Female 0.54*** 0.50–0.60 0.81** 0.70–0.93
Age group
 50–64 Ref Ref
 65–74 1.31*** 1.15–1.49 1.19 0.98–1.46
 75+ 2.25*** 1.95–2.59 1.89*** 1.53–2.33
LR test χ 2 = 33.05 p < .001 χ 2 = 0.04 p = .842
Phase B 3. Referral to ear specialist, n = 1,466 4. Hearing aid recommendation, n = 1,466
SEP 0.93 0.82–1.06 0.88* 0.78–0.99
Gender
 Female 1.00 0.79–1.28 1.00 0.80–1.27
Age group
 50–64 Ref Ref
 65–74 1.35 0.95–1.92 1.83*** 1.32–2.54
 75+ 2.05*** 1.43–2.93 5.11*** 3.64–7.16
LR test χ 2 = 1.14 p = .285 χ 2 = 4.13 p = .042
Phase C 5. Hearing aid obtaineda, n = 818 6. Hearing aid use, n = 732
SEP 1.25 0.97–1.60 1.09 0.91–1.32
Gender
 Female 1.61 0.95–2.75 1.20 0.82–1.77
Age group
 50–64 Ref Ref
 65–74 3.02** 1.45–6.26 1.13 0.65–1.98
 75+ 4.21*** 2.20–8.08 1.64 0.96–2.79
LR test χ 2 = 2.85 p = .092 χ 2 = 0.90 p = .343

Notes. CI = confidence interval; LR = likelihood ratio; OR = odds ratio. LR test χ 2 and p value of the model comparing adjusted model with SEP to adjusted model without SEP.

All models adjusted for gender, age group, marital status, retirement status, and ownership of private health insurance.

aInteraction effect identified and further described in Table 3.

p value for Wald test, levels of significance: *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.