Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 18;6(6):483–490. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i6.483

Table 1.

Information used to predict post surgery outcomes

Patient characteristics and history
Patient personality and expectations1, including motivation
Age, occupation/unemployment, social issues, smoking, weight
Presence or absence of personal injury or yellow flags
Diabetes, other medical co-morbidities
Clinical information including patient history, e.g., symptoms duration
Use of outcome data, e.g., DRAM, GAD7, ODI, PHQ9, SF36, SRS, VAS pain, walking
Response to previous approaches, e.g., physiotherapy, facet joint injections, discogram, disc block
Pathology or degree of deformity
Number of levels predominant leg pain; more leg than back pain
Performance based outcome measures
Neurological examination
Imaging: CT scans, CT with 3D reconstruction, discography, MRI scans, X-ray
Evidence
Audit of data from past patients
Literature or empirical evidence
Experiential clinical experience
Other
Pathology: segmental instability, single level, spondylolisthesis, central disc protrusion
Pain mechanism: no features of chronic regional pain syndrome (allodynia, non-anatomical pain), stenosis
1

Realistic expectations (VAS 4/10 end result would be satisfactory). DRAM: Distress Risk Assessment Method; GAD7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index; PHQ9: Patient health questionnaire - depression component; VAS: Visual analogue scale; SRS: Session rating scale.