Skip to main content
. 2014 May 4;14(Suppl 1):51–58. doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0364-0

Table 2.

The comparison of RULA score categories across three study groups

RULA score categories SSC (n = 30) CC1 (n = 30) CC2 (n = 30) P values (intergroup comparisons)
SSC v/s CC1 SSC v/s CC2 CC1 v/s CC2
Right
 Acceptable conditions (RULA score 1 OR 2) 8 (26.7) 0 0 0.001 (highly significant) 0.001 (highly significant) 0.640 (non significant)
 Change may be required (RULA score 3 OR 4) 22 (73.3) 0 0
 Change required soon (RULA score 5 OR 6) 0 2 (6.7) 3 (10.0)
 Change required immediately (RULA score 7 OR 8) 0 28 (93.3) 27 (90.0)
Left
 Acceptable conditions (RULA score 1 OR 2) 11 (36.7) 0 0 0.001 (highly significant) 0.001 (highly significant) 0.047 (significant)
 Change may be required (RULA score 3 OR 4) 19 (63.3) 0 0
 Change required soon (RULA score 5 OR 6) 0 13 (43.3) 5 (16.7)
 Change required immediately (RULA score 7 OR 8) 0 17 (56.7) 25 (83.3)