Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 14;11(26):4067–4077. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067

Table 4.

Healing rate of refractory esophagitis at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 wk comparing PPIs with H2RA

Author PPIs
H2RAs
Number of
Healing rate ( ITT )
Number of
Healing rate ( ITT )
Drug Dose Patient 4 wk 8 wk 12 wk Drug Dose Patient 4 wk 8 wk 12 wk
sd PPIs vs sd H2RA
Feldman (55) Lan 30 o.d. 61 54/61 Ran 150 b.d. 32 12/32
Sontag (56) Lan 30 o.d. 105 75/105 84/105 Ran 150 b.d. 54 28/54 16/541
Pooled data 166 75/105 138/166 86 28/54 28/86
Pooled rate (%) 71.4 83.1 51.9 32.6
hd PPIs vs hd H2RA
Lundell (57) Ome 40 o.d. 51 32/51 35/51 46/51 Ran 300 b.d. 47 8/47 18/47 22/47

Ome: omeprazole; Lan: lansoprazole; Ran: ranitidine; o.d.: once daily in the morning; b.d.: twice daily; h.d.: high dose; sd: standard dose. This study did not report cumulative healing rate at 8 wk. All patients’ endpoint was at 8 wk. The decreased healing rate at 8 wk for ranitidine group may be due to subsequent relapse of esophagitis.